Rapper Consequence has publicly addressed a scene from the new Kanye West documentary, In Whose Name. The scene shows a tense interaction between West and comedian Michael Che. Consequence posted a video on X on September 20 to share his perspective on the event, aiming to provide a clear account of what happened and why he intervened.
The specific clip sparked discussions online, leading Consequence to offer details that he claims were not fully presented in the final documentary edit. He emphasized the importance of understanding the full context of the moment.
Key Takeaways
- Consequence clarified a scene from the Kanye West documentary In Whose Name.
- The scene depicted a tense exchange between Kanye West and Michael Che.
- Consequence stated the incident occurred after an SNL performance.
- He claims the documentary edit omitted a second, more heated interaction.
- Consequence asserted he de-escalated the situation twice.
Incident After Saturday Night Live Performance
Consequence explained that the incident took place in the early morning hours, around 1:30 a.m., after a performance with Kanye West on Saturday Night Live. His seven-year-old son was waiting outside the studio at the time. As he went to collect his child, Consequence entered a conversation already in progress.
The participants in this discussion were Kanye West, Michael Che, and Pete Davidson. A documentary crew member, director Nico, was also present, filming the interaction. Consequence described his initial confusion upon entering the situation.
Fact Check
- Time: Approximately 1:30 a.m.
- Location: Outside the Saturday Night Live studio.
- Attendees: Kanye West, Michael Che, Pete Davidson, Consequence, and documentary director Nico.
West was standing directly in front of him, Che was to his left, and Davidson to his right. It took Consequence a moment to understand the escalating tension of the conversation. Once he recognized the situation was becoming strained, he decided to intervene.
Consequence's Initial De-escalation
Consequence stated his priority was to defuse the growing tension. He considered the setting a professional environment. His approach was direct and aimed at postponing the discussion.
"So because we were in a business setting, I tapped that guy [Che] on the shoulder and said we should reconvene this conversation for a later," Consequence said in his video.
Following this, Consequence guided Kanye West away from the confrontation. He believed this initial intervention had successfully prevented further escalation at that moment. However, he noted that the documentary's final cut did not include a crucial follow-up event.
Background on In Whose Name
In Whose Name is a new documentary focusing on Kanye West. Documentaries often involve extensive editing, which can lead to certain moments or details being excluded from the final version. This practice can sometimes alter the perceived context of events for viewers.
The Omitted Second Exchange
According to Consequence, the documentary edit omitted a significant second exchange. He claimed that after the initial de-escalation, Michael Che returned to the scene. Che was visibly upset, leading to another confrontation.
Consequence criticized the documentary's editing for this omission. He felt it misrepresented the full scope of the interaction. "That why I don’t f— with edits," he stated, highlighting his frustration with how the film presented the event.
During this second interaction, Consequence claims the situation became more heated. He recounted his response to Che's return.
"When he came back beefing, I told that n—a, ‘Look, n—a, either you back the f— up or we could go outside.’ He chose to back the f— up," Consequence explained.
This account suggests a more intense resolution than what viewers saw in the documentary. Consequence believes this second part of the interaction was critical to understanding his role in managing the situation.
Corroboration and Wider Implications
After the second confrontation, Consequence said he gathered West and others, and they left the building. He offered potential witnesses who could corroborate his story. He named Kim Kardashian, Michael Che, and Nico, the documentary director, as individuals who were present and could confirm his account.
Consequence's comments reflect a broader concern about selective editing in documentary filmmaking. He argued that the final cut often loses important behind-the-scenes context. This can significantly impact how high-profile figures, like Kanye West, are perceived by the public.
- Potential Witnesses: Kim Kardashian, Michael Che, Nico (documentary director).
- Issue Highlighted: The impact of selective editing on public perception.
By presenting his version of events, Consequence positioned himself as the individual who actively de-escalated a potentially volatile situation. He stressed that without his intervention, the encounter might have escalated further. Neither Kanye West nor Michael Che has publicly commented on Consequence's statements regarding the documentary scene.
Documentary Editing Impact
Documentary films often condense hours of footage into a concise narrative. This process can inadvertently remove context, leading to different interpretations of events. Viewers rely on the editorial choices made by filmmakers to understand complex interactions.
This clarification from Consequence provides an additional layer of detail to a moment that garnered significant attention. It underscores the ongoing discussions about authenticity and narrative control in media portrayals of public figures. The full picture, according to Consequence, involves more than what was initially shown to the audience.
The rapper's decision to speak out highlights the personal stakes involved when private moments become public through documentary releases. His desire to correct the record emphasizes the importance of complete storytelling, especially when reputations and perceptions are at play. This situation serves as a reminder that edited content may not always reflect the entire truth of an event.